Legal Opinion

Railroad Co. v. Brundige

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM FRANKLIN. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Franklin County. — S. D. McReynolds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields

Mrs. W. S. Brundige, her husband joining her, sued the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railroad Company for the recovery of damages for injuries sustained by her in a collision on its road; she being .a passenger on one of the colliding trains.

The railway company pleaded not guilty and accord and satisfaction; the last plea being based upon a compromise made with Mrs. Brundige June 14, 1902, two' days after the accident. Mrs. Brundige replied to this plea that at the time the compromise was made she was *33suffering from a profound mental shock and nervous prostration, caused by her injuries,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bruce v. BeallTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Walker v. Walker'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. White v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. May v. BradleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CozartTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Scott v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Smoot v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Hager v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Smith v. Grumman-Olsen Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API