Legal Opinion
United States v. Kerry J. Nahoom
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 17, 1986No. 85-3281PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
FACTS
On December 20, 1984, appellant Kerry Nahoom was indicted by a federal grand jury on three counts. Count I charged Nahoom with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Count II charged him with conspiracy to import marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 963. Count III charged appellant with conspiracy to conduct and participate in the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). Nahoom pled not guilty to each count and was tried…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. BoldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alton Spradlen and Joseph ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Roy Lee BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Karen CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert Christopher Ingraham A/K/A Arthur Robert MacKeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Juan Andres CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.