Legal Opinion

Hayes v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 15, 2005No. 93,310PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Michael S. Hayes appeals the district court’s dismissal of his K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1507 motion. The district court ruled the motion was barred by the 1-year statute of limitations at K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1507(f), which became effective on July 1, 2003. L. 2003, ch. 65, sec. 1. We hold the 1-year statute of limitations at 60-1507(f) begins to run for preexisting claims on the date the statute became effective. Because Hayes filed his 60-1507 motion on November 25, 2003, the district court erred in dismissing the motion based upon the statute of limitations.

The facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pabst v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Tolen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Ludlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. Toney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. SzczygielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API