Hayes v. State
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone, J.:
Michael S. Hayes appeals the district court’s dismissal of his K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1507 motion. The district court ruled the motion was barred by the 1-year statute of limitations at K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1507(f), which became effective on July 1, 2003. L. 2003, ch. 65, sec. 1. We hold the 1-year statute of limitations at 60-1507(f) begins to run for preexisting claims on the date the statute became effective. Because Hayes filed his 60-1507 motion on November 25, 2003, the district court erred in dismissing the motion based upon the statute of limitations.
The facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pabst v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Tolen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Ludlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Toney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- State v. SzczygielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.