Legal Opinion

State v. Vereen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 2006No. COA05-255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In general, when a defendant pleads not guilty at an arraignment, he may not be tried without his consent in the week in which he is arraigned.1 In this case, Defendant Christopher L. Vereen contends the trial court erred by beginning his trial (without his consent) the same day on which he was arraigned. Because Defendant twice moved the trial court to continue his case during his formal arraignment so he could obtain evidence he subpoenaed and so his witnesses would be available, we reverse the trial court’s decision to conduct Defendant’s trial on the same day as his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. ShookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. TrullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. McNairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. VereenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API