Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1978No. 7815SC612PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant Davis assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for continuance on the day of his arraignment, in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-943(b).

§ 15A-943: Arraignment in superior court — required calendaring. — (a) In counties in which there are regularly scheduled 20 or more weeks of trial sessions of superior court at which criminal cases are heard, and in other counties the Chief Justice designates, the prosecutor must calendar arraignments in the superior court on at least the first day of every other week in which criminal cases are heard. No…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. GaitenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. PeviaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. WinsteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. CatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API