Legal Opinion

State v. Vereen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 2006No. COA05-255Published

1Opinion of the Court

628 S.E.2d 408 (2006)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Christopher L. VEREEN, Defendant.

No. COA05-255.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 18, 2006.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General M. Janette Soles, for the State.

Appellate Defender Staples S. Hughes, by Assistant Appellate Defender Kelly D. Miller, for defendant-appellant.

WYNN, Judge.

In general, when a defendant pleads not guilty at an arraignment, he may not be tried without his consent in the week in which he is arraigned.[1] In this case, Defendant Christopher L. Vereen contends the trial court erred by beginning his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. ShookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. TrullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API