Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Little

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1862PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Case made after judgment from Saginaw Circuit. The action was trover, brought by Stephenson against William L. P. Little, M'oses B. Hess and Daniel Boutell, for a quantity of saw logs. Plea, the general issue. It appeared in evidence that in the winter of 1856-7 plaintiff got out and-'haulea upon Potobaco lake and its outlet some 2,600 pine saw logs. A portion of these was cut on and owned by the plaintiff, and others upon land belonging to the Government.

Read the full summary

Case made after judgment from Saginaw Circuit. The action was trover, brought by Stephenson against William L. P. Little, M'oses B. Hess and Daniel Boutell, for a quantity of saw logs. Plea, the general issue. It appeared in evidence that in the winter of 1856-7 plaintiff got out and-'haulea upon Potobaco lake and its outlet some 2,600 pine saw logs. A portion of these was cut on and owned by the plaintiff, and others upon land belonging to the Government. Still another portion was out upon lot three of section thirty in township fifteen north of range five east, on which plaintiff seems to…

1Opinion of the Court

Manning J.:

The judgment I think should be affirmed. In trover the right of property is in issue, and to sustain the action plaintiff must prove property in himself, either general or special. Possession is not sufficient for that purpose, as in trespass. It is evidence of property, but.it does not, as in *440trespass, preelude defendant from showing property in a third person." The theory of the action is that the goods belong to the plaintiff, that he lost them, that they came to defendant^ possession by finding, and that he afterwards wrongfully converted them to his own use. As plaintiff never…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hesseltine v. StockwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  2. Bryant v. WareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Mitchell v. Georgia & Alabama RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Smith v. MottleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Claflin & Co. v. Continental Jersey WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Liberty Bell Gold Mining Co. v. Smuggler-Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API