Legal Opinion
Maull v. Division of State Police
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 3, 2001No. CIV.A.99-179-JJFPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I.54) filed by Defendants, the Division of State Police, the Department of Public Safety, the State of Delaware, Colonel Alan D. Ellingsworth, and Lieutenant Colonel Gerald R. Pepper, Jr. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural Background
The instant action arises as a result of Plaintiffs termination from his employment as a Delaware State Trooper. By his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dossey Douglas v. California Department of Youth AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Medlin v. Rome Strip Steel Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Maull v. Division of State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Haskins v. CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Taylor v. Procter & Gamble Dover WipesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.