Turn Key Gaming, Inc., Miller & Schroeder Investments Corp. v. Oglala Sioux Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Miller & Schroeder Investment Corp. appeals the District Court’s denial of its application to intervene as of right under Fed. R.Civ.P. 24(a). We hold that Miller & Schroeder has satisfied the requirements of Rule 24(a), and we therefore reverse.
The pending lawsuit involves a dispute over a Management Agreement between Turn Key Gaming, Inc., and the Oglala Sioux Tribe, under which Turn Key was to develop, construct, and manage a gaming facility on Oglala Sioux tribal lands. All costs of constructing and equipping the project were to be advanced by Turn Key and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, Oneida of the Thames Band, the Houdenosaunee, Applicants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Turn Key Gaming, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Oglala Sioux Tribe, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Union Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- South Dakota Ex Rel. Barnett v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- David Swinton v. Adam J. StarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Town of Washington GroveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.