Legal Opinion
South Dakota Ex Rel. Barnett v. United States Department of Interior
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2003No. 01-3611PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Chief Judge.
The State of South Dakota, City of Oacoma, and Lyman County (hereinafter, collectively “South Dakota”) brought an action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the United States Department of Interior, the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, the Regional Director, and the Superintendent of the Lower Brule Agency (hereinafter, collectively “United States”). South Dakota sought to prevent the United States from placing approximately 91 acres of land located outside the Lower Brule Reservation into trust on behalf of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (hereinafter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Mausolf v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Shermoen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota v. Tarek Ibn Ziyad AcademyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- North Dakota Ex Rel. Stenehjem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Larry Flynt v. George LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.