Legal Opinion

Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, Oneida of the Thames Band, the Houdenosaunee, Applicants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 5, 1984No. 893, Docket 83-7910PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIEANT, District Judge:

Appellant, the Houdenosaunee, or “People of the Longhouse,” also known as the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy, together with five of its constituent nations, the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca and Tuscarora nations, appeal from an order of the United States District Court of the Northern District of New York (McCurn, J.), which denied leave to intervene as of right in a pending action for ejectment and to recover damages for trespass to real property, which litigation is more particularly described below.1 For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. The New York IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Banco Nacional De Cuba, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Bethune Plaza, Inc. v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Ethnic Employees of the Library of Congress v. BoorstinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. DelmonteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API