Heckstall v. McGrath
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit respondent from permitting audiovisual coverage and still photography of court proceedings in petitioner’s underlying criminal action.
During petitioner’s arraignment on the charge of first degree murder in County Court, Rensselaer County, he objected to the presence of television and still cameras in the courtroom and requested that they be banned. Respondent, based upon his prior determination in People v Zwack (188 Misc 2d 761 [2001]), denied petitioner’s request and indicated that he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mollen v. MathewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- McLaughlin v. EidensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schmitt v. SkoviraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. OdellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Patel v. BreslinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Getman v. BernierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Crosby v. CrossettNew York Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.