Legal Opinion

State v. Singleton

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 21, 2005No. 92,638PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Movant Ronald G. Singleton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under K.S.A. 22-3504(1), arguing his sentence should be modified from a severity level 1 offense to a severity level 3 offense following State v. McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, 83 P.3d 161 (2004). In the alternative, the movant argues the court erred in denying his motion to file a direct appeal 18 months out of time.

This record shows that in August 2002 the movant and the State presented the district court with a plea agreement where the movant agreed to enter a plea of guilty to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Buchanan v. OverleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. DumarsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API