Legal Opinion

State v. Phinney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 2005No. 90,639, 91,068PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Defendant Justin E. Phinney pled no contest to possession of pseudoephedrine and brings both an appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to reduce sentence and, pursuant to State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982), an out-of-time direct appeal of his sentence. He argues he should be resentenced under the identical offense doctrine as applied in State v. Frazier, 30 Kan. App. 2d 398, 42 P.3d 188, rev. denied 274 Kan. 1115 (2002). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court in an unpublished opinion filed July…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. State v. Van CleaveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. Albright v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. GillSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API