Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Parry

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 18, 2015No. 113130Published

1DissentGardner, J.

While I agree with foe majority that *936the State should not piece-meal its theories about tire legality of a search and try them seriatim, I do not agree that the law of the case doctrine applies here.

The law of tire case doctrine is a discretionaiy policy of the trial court which is not generally raised in tire first instance by an appellate court. “The law of the case doctrine is a discretionary policy which allows the court to refuse to reopen a matter already decided, without limiting its power to do so.” Davin v. Athletic Club of Overland Park, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1240, 1242, 96 P.3d 687…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. GossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API