Legal Opinion
Eustis v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided April 25, 2006No. 14-04-01004-CRPublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.
Appellant Donald Arthur Eustis appeals his conviction of aggravated assault, asserting (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction, and (2) the trial court denied his right to confront and cross-examine witnesses used against him. We affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On November 10, 2002, Sergeant Ron Cleere of the Huntsville Police Department received a call from dispatch. He was asked to respond to an anonymous call about a woman who was possibly in danger and may have been beaten by a baseball bat. The caller identified the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Blea v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Wright v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ricardo Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Grant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Terry Michael Sizemore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.