Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Buck v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 15, 1964No. 11003Published

1ConcurrenceHughes, Justice

In 1849, when Ritter v. Hamilton, 4 Tex. 325, was decided, the only statutes relating to sureties were embraced in an Act of the First Legislature of the State of Texas, 1846, entitled, “An Act to Regulate Proceedings in the District Courts,”1 which are:

“INSTITUTION OF SUITS '
“Sec. 4. * * * Be it further enacted, That no person shall be sued as endorser, as guarantor, or as security, unless suit shall have been, or is simultaneously commenced against the principal, except in cases where the principal resides beyond the limits of the State, or in a county that is not organized, or where he is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. F. Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. Wells & ChestnuttTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. E. E. Cloer General Contractor, Inc., and United States Guarantee CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Rudman v. Railroad Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. First Nat. Bank in Lubbock v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API