Legal Opinion
State v. Rosado
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 2, 1991No. 13692PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The defendant was charged in a substitute information with possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 He was also charged under Part B of the substitute information as a subsequent offender, having previously been convicted of violating the same statute. A jury found the defendant guilty as charged in the substitute information and he then pleaded guilty to being a subsequent offender. The trial court sentenced the defendant to a term of imprisonment of thirty years, the execution of which was suspended after twenty years. He was also placed…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.