Legal Opinion

Weitensteiner v. Engdahl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1923No. 17162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Weitensteiner, plaintiff below, is the owner of the northeast quarter of section 12, and the southeast quarter of section 1, all in township 30, north, range 40, east of the Willamette Meridian. The first of these quarter sections he acquired under the homestead laws of the United States by settlement thereon, initiated in 1889. The second of the quarter sections he acquired by mesne conveyances from the Northern Pacific Railway Company; entering into an executory contract for its purchase in 1908, and paying out and receiving a deed therefor in 1912. The railway company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nesalhous v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Sander v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Still v. Palouse Irrigation & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Mason v. YearwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Sander v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hunter Land Co. v. LaugenourWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. McBeeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Drake v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lawrence v. SouthardWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Allison v. LinnWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API