Legal Opinion

Holloman v. . Holloman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Stacy, Jat April Term, 1916, of Heet-EORD.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, C. J\

This is a petition for a certiorari by the defendant, who appealed as a pauper. He alleges that by consent the appellant was allowed sixty days to serve the case on appeal and the appellee sixty days thereafter to serve his counter-case or exceptions; that on 26 June, within the time agreed, the appellant served his ease on appeal and that on 10 July, 1916, the appellee served what purported to be her exceptions or counter-case, which the appellant deemed insufficient under Revisal, 591, for the reason that the appellee did not return with his counter-ease the copy of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Pike v. . SeymourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API