Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Where there is a controversy as to whether the case on appeal was served within the time fixed or allowed, or service within such time waived, it is the duty of the trial court to find the facts, hear motions and enter appropriate orders thereon. Holloman v. Holloman, 172 N. C., 835, 90 S. E., 10; Barrus v. R. R., 121 N. C., 504, 28 S. E., 187; Walker v. Scott, 102 N. C., 487, 9 S. E., 488; Cummings v. Hoffman, 113 N. C., 267, 18 S. E., 170.

It appears, without contradiction, that appellant’s statement of case on appeal was not served within the time allowed by agreement of counsel, hence the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Wallace v. . SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Cummings v. . HoffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Delafield v. Lewis Mercer Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. American Floor MacHine Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Pike v. . SeymourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API