Legal Opinion

Pike v. . Seymour

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1942PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants’ Appeal in the Pike Case.

Denny, J.

Counsel for plaintiff, David Y. Pike, filed motion in this Court to affirm the judgment below for the reason that no case on appeal has been settled by agreement of counsel or by order of the court.

It is admitted on the record that the defendants did not serve statement of case on appeal within ninety days from 16 January, 1942, the time allowed by the court for serving said case; however, defendants contend an agreed case was served and accepted by plaintiff’s counsel, as set forth in the following language: “Service of the foregoing accepted case…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Peoples v. FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Morris v. Jenrette Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. McKinnon v. . Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API