State v. Mondaine
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for bribery of a public servant and the ensuing sentence of two years. The dispositive issue is the validity of the information.
The evidence at trial consisted in large part of the transcription of a surreptitious recording of a conversation between a detective and the defendant. The conversation can best be described as vague and convoluted. The issue presented does not require any full analysis of this evidence, and it will be referred to only in connection with the point presented.
In pertinent part, the information challenged reads as follows:
[0…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. DownsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. LuskSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. NewhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. FennerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EckardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. SinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. VoylesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. VoylesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985