Legal Opinion

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mah

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 1, 1975No. Record 750488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtI’Anson, C.J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. K. C. Mah, brought this action against the defendant, Greyhound Lines, Inc., to recover damages for the value of her baggage allegedly lost through defendant’s negligence. The trial court, after hearing the case without a jury, held that Greyhound breached its contract of carriage in failing to provide plaintiff transportation on a “through bus,” and thus the National Baggage Tariff was inapplicable. Thereupon, judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,000.55.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the National Baggage Tariff No. A-500-G, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Rocky Ford Moving Vans, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Cray v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Argo v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  5. Neece v. Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. KerriganDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1999
  2. Pettit v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Stafford County Circuit Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API