Legal Opinion
Pettit v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
Stafford County Circuit Court
Decided May 6, 1992No. Case No. (Law) 770-91; Case No. (Law) 771-91; Case No. (Law) 772-91; Case No. (Law) 773-91PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge James W. Haley, Jr.
In these four related cases, defendants Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia and Contel of Virginia, Incorporated (“the utilities”) have demurred and filed Special Pleas in Bar to pleadings alleging them liable for failure of Enhanced 911 Emergency Telecommunications Services (“E-911 Services”).
Pursuant to its Miscellaneous Service Arrangements Tariff and its provisions on Universal Emergency Number 911 Services, Defendant Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia entered into a contract in 1986 with Stafford County to provide E-911 services.
L…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Rosillo v. WintersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A. v. Airline Tariff Publishing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008