Legal Opinion
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kerrigan
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided May 28, 1999No. 3:97CV554PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, Chief Judge.
Pending is the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (doc. 48) Also pending is the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, (doc. 79)
I. BACKGROUND
In 1992, plaintiff BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (“BellSouth”) introduced a new “Nil” service in the state of Florida. The Nil service is a three-digit local dialing arrangement available in specified areas for the delivery of general information over the telephone. BellSouth made available for assignment in specified areas the Nil telephone numbers 211, 811, 511, 711, and 811. Nil Subscribers who contracted…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Mikele S. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Jose Garcia-Pendrosa, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Satellite System, Inc. v. Birch Telecom of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Duggal v. G.E. Capital Communications Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Iowa Network Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
- Satellite System, Inc. v. Birch Telecom of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002