Legal Opinion
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 27, 1994No. 94-322PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable House:
The undersigned justices of the supreme court submit the following reply to your questions of May 5, 1994. Following our receipt of your resolution, we invited interested parties to file memoranda with the court on or before September 1, 1994.
SB 636 (the bill), as amended, proposes to amend RSA chapter 483-B (1992) by inserting after section 9 a new section, 483-B:9-a, titled “Public Use of Coastal Beaches.” The legislature’s purpose is set out in the bill as follows:
It is the purpose of the general court in this section to recognize and confirm the historical practice…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Reitsma v. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Robert Jesurum v. WBTSCC Limited Partnership & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLC v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.