Legal Opinion

Braymant v. W. H. Weatherly & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 14, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The statement of facts is derived from the admission of the parties and the testimony of the plaintiff, the only witness examined at the hearing. The determinative facts are therefore admitted. The plaintiff was employed to drive a truck. His services in this capacity indicated his sole relation to the business of his employer. His “reporting” at Weatherly’s garage he explained to be the mere act of going there and getting the truck. He stored his bicycle at the garage and drove the truck to the store; when the day’s work was done he returned the truck to the garage and rode home on his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Hunt v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Dependents of Phifer v. Foremost Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Wilkie v. . StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bass v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Hardy v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Massey v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Kiger v. Bahnson Service CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API