Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Lyon
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 15, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion
On final hearing on original bill and answer, and supplemental bill and answer, and proofs taken in open court.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
The principal object of this suit is to remove and abate a xtuisauce. The premises in controversy are situate on the southeast corner of Mulberry and Elm streets, in the city of Newark. They were originally owned by Dr. Luther G. Thomas. He died ou the 1st day of May, 1864, leaving a will, bearing date March 13th, 1863. By his will the loans in quo was devised as follows:
“ First. I give, devise and bequeath all my real estate, wheresoever situated, of which I may die seized or possessed, to my brother, Lemuel Thomas, and his heirs and assigns forever; upon conditions,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Chenango Bridge Co. v. . PaigeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- People ex rel. Teschemacher v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Linzee v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. TOWNECRAFT, ETC, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962