Legal Opinion

Aft Michigan v. State of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2015No. Docket 148748PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted leave to appeal to address the constitutionality of 2012 PA 300, which modified the retirement benefits of current public school employees. Plaintiffs, which are various labor organizations representing such employees, raise three constitutional challenges: (1) whether the act violates the prohibitions of uncompensated takings in the Michigan and United States Constitutions, Const 1963, art 10, § 2 and US Const, Ams V and XIV; (2) whether the act impairs the obligation of contracts in violation of the Michigan and United States Constitutions, Const 1963, art 1, § 10 and US Const,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Bank of America Na v. First American Title Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Kola Hasanaj v. Detroit Pub. Schs. Cmty. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API