Thrush v. Thrush
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNs, J.
Eule No. 19 of the Eules of Practice in the Supreme Court provides that pleadings, issues and judgment shall be a part of the transcript in all cases. Eule 20 provides that memoranda of pleadings will not be received or recognized in the Supreme Court as pleadings, even by consent of counsel. The record in this case does not contain the complaint. The trial judge took its contents into account in his findings of fact. Exceptions were duly taken both to the court’s findings and to its refusal to make requested findings. On review here, therefore, this Court, in the absence of the complaint,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mooneyham v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Ward v. Kolman Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Griners' & Shaw, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Williams v. Asheville Contracting CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Johnson v. HooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975