Washington County v. Norfolk Southern Land Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
While it may well be doubted that any valid exceptive assignment of error has been made to appear, it is noted at the threshold of this appeal that the pleadings are not contained in the record. Only excerpts from the complaint are shown in the findings of fact, to which the parties agree. Hence, in accordance with the uniform practice in such cases, the appeal must be dismissed. See S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N. C., 47, 175 S. E., 713, and cases there cited. Rule 19, section 1, of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 544, at page 553, requires “that the pleadings on which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- J. O. Plott Co. v. H. K. Ferguson Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Thrush v. ThrushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.