Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Dunlap

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 1929No. 827. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

Appellee instituted this suit to recover from appellants, the Texas Company, Texas Pipe Line Company, and the Kirby Petroleum Company, judgment for $40,-000, the alleged value of oil which he claimed said defendants had extracted from certain. land owned by him. Said appellants, by cross-action, brought in a number of defendants, asking in event they were cast in the suit, for judgment over against said cross-defendants. The cause was tried to the court, and resulted in judgment being entered for plaintiff against the Texas Company and the Kirby Petroleum Company for the admitted value of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Wiseman v. CottinghamTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Harle v. Langdon's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Glaze v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. McLean v. StithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. DunlapTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Trujillo v. PiaroteTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Them v. ManhattanLife Assurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API