Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Dunlap

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1931No. 1238-5619PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY,' J.

We adopt from the opinion [21 S.W.(2d) 707] of the Court of Civil Appeals the following statement of the case:

“Appellee instituted this suit to recover from appellants, the Texas Company, Texas Pipe Line Company, and the Kirby Petroleum Company, judgment for $40,000, the alleged value of oil which he claimed said defendants had extracted from certain land owned by him. Said appellants, by cross-action, brought in a number of defendants, asking in event they were cast in the suit, for judgment over against said cross-defendants. The cause was tried to the court, and resulted in.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Wiseman v. CottinghamTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cargill & Dennis v. Kountze Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Holford v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Glaze v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Barfield v. Holland, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gilbert v. LobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API