Legal Opinion

Childress v. CoreCivic

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 20, 2022No. 1:21-cv-01148Unknown

1Opinion

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION JAMES L. CHILDRESS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 21-1148-SHM-tmp ) CORECIVIC, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ADD A DEFENDANT (ECF NO. 2); MODIFYING THE DOCKET; DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NOS. 1 & 2) WITHOUT PREJUDICE; GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND; AND DENYING PENDING MOTION (ECF NOS. 6 & 7) On October 5, 2021, Plaintiff James L. Childress filed a pro se complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 3.)1 On October 5, 2021, Childress filed a motion to add the “CoreCivic…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API