Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Milholland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 3, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The ease is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, J.

In June, 1868, Ellen Kelly and Ann McDonnell, the appellant, entered into a co-partnership, to carry on a small grocery business in the City of Baltimore, at the corner of Forrest street and Hull’s lane. In the articles of co-partnership, dated the 2'Tth of June, 1868, it was stipulated that all the net profits accruing from the business should be held and owned jointly by them, share and share alike; and that, in the event of the death of either, the survivor should have the body of the deceased decently buried, according to the rights of the Church to which she might belong, and pay the sum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Stockett's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1825
  2. Showman v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  3. Beard v. HubbleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Preston v. HorwitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Harman v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  3. Witts v. HorneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Brady v. BerkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API