Legal Opinion

Witts v. Horney

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 7, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The appeal in this case was taken from a decree, passed by agreement of counsel, dismissing the hill of complaint. The cáse is stated in the opinion of this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

There is no difficulty as to the law relating to resulting trusts. The numerous decisions of this Court upon the subject have placed it beyond controversy here. Where one party purchases an estate, and pays the money, and the deed is taken in the name of another, a trust results *586bv construction of law to tbe party who paid the money, and such payment may be proved by parol; but in all such cases the proof of payment by the cestui que trust must be clear, direct, and explicit. This strictness of proof is required, because of the danger of rendering titles depending upon deeds and other written…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Groff v. RohrerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Dorsey v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1819
  3. Hollida v. ShoopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  4. Keller v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  5. Faringer v. RamsayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  2. National Union Bank v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. 1st Nat'l Bk. of Catonsville v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Vogel v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API