Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jorgenson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1986No. 160 E.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This appeal arises out of the Appellant’s conviction of rape, indecent sexual assault, and simple assault. Prior to trial the Appellant filed a motion in limine requesting that the court exclude evidence of seminal acid phosphatase found in a pair of black panties worn by the victim the night of the alleged rape and the testimony of the emergency room physician who examined the victim and found her to be internally bruised. The purpose of the motion was to exclude this evidence because of the Appellant’s perception that the Rape Shield Law, Act of May 18,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MajoranaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. OginSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. NievesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API