Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Richardson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1994No. 01681PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed upon Appellant following his conviction for simple assault 1 at the conclusion of a bench trial. Timely filed post-verdict motions were denied, and Appellant was sentenced to two years probation. This direct appeal followed in which the sole issue raised is whether the Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm.

In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict winner and drawing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. OginSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. In the Interest of J.L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. WerteletSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. EckroteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API