Wright v. Arkansas & Missouri Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1ConcurrenceLimbaugh, District Judge
I concur in the principal opinion affirming the district court on all issues, but I write separately to advocate a different approach to the Locomotive Inspection Act claim. The majority adopts a “totality of the circumstances” test to evaluate whether the accident occurred when the locomotive was “in use,” which is a prerequisite to liability under the LIA. But the locomotive in this case was “blue flagged,” which means, under LIA regulations, that the railroad is prohibited from moving the locomotive, and which is to say that the locomotive cannot be put “in use.” A better rule then, in my…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dennis Deans v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kenneth v. Angell v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Jesus A. Trinidad v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.