Legal Opinion

Trojanovich v. Marshall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1963No. 6949PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, Justice.

John Trojanovich, hereinafter called appellant, brought a civil action, by and through his guardian ad litem, for injuries sustained by him in an automobile accident. The jury rendered a verdict for defendants (appellees) and judgment was entered thereon. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied. From the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial, this appeal followed.

This appeal is predicated on the grounds that the lower court committed error in instructing the jury. Appellants assigned as error the giving of two particular instructions and we, of our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Tossman v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wolfswinkel v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Michie v. CalhounArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wolfswinkel v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Williams v. ThudeArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Holtz v. HolderArizona Supreme Court · 1966

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API