Legal Opinion

Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Hood Rubber Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2756PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is a trade-mark opposition proceeding in which appellee, Hood Rubber Company opposes the registration by appellant, Weyenberg Shoe Manufacturing Company, •of a mark comprising the words “Red Arrow” imposed upon a representation of an arrow, which representation has in the feathered portion thereof two concentric circles, within the smaller of which is placed the 'letter “W.”

The mark sought to be registered is stated to have been used by appellant for leather shoes continuously since August, 1923. The ■application was filed March 29,1928.

Appellee, in opposing,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Pink Lady Corporation v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. Shunk Manufacturing Company v. Tarrant Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Pennsylvania Petroleum Co. v. Pennzoil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Plastron, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API