Oakleaf Mobile Home Park v. Mancilla
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant Anthony Mancilla appeals the trial court’s refusal to award costs and attorney fees under ORS 90.255. He argues that, because plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its forcible entry and detainer (FED) action against him, he is the prevailing party and is entitled to costs and attorney fees. We reverse and remand.
On December 24, 2001, plaintiff served defendants 1 with a 24-hour eviction notice. On January 3, 2002, plaintiff filed a residential eviction complaint with the trial court. The complaint asserted that plaintiff was entitled to possession of the property under ORS 90.400(3). 2…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Stocker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wiper v. FawkesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. FerraraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008