Legal Opinion
Albert D. Lancellotti v. Office of Personnel Management
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 31, 1983No. 82-3202PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, Albert D. Lancellotti, seeks review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) affirming respondent Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM’s) order to terminate petitioner’s disability annuity. Respondent argues that this Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the merits of the case. This contention compels us to confront the difficult interplay among several statutes that may grant appellate jurisdiction.
For the reasons that follow, we hold that, while Lancellotti’s petition is not reviewable under either 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (Supp.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Erika, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Scroggins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Treasury Employees Union v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board and United States Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- William E. Scarborough v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Wayne Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hondros v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.