Legal Opinion

Case of Lowenthal

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1882No. 8,559PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Accusation against Attorney.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

The defendant objects to the written “ application” that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause for his removal or suspension.

Section 287 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an attorney and counselor may be removed for certain causes “ arising after his admission to practice.”

With the exception of the alleged fraud of defendant, by which he obtained a license from this Court, the charges against defendant are based upon transactions occurring while he was a member of the bar of New York.

We do not deem it necessary to inquire whether under our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Field v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Stratmore v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In re HoveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In re OlmsteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Propper v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API