Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Cohen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 16, 1987No. 4785PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is the adequacy of the evidentiary underpinning of the trial court’s award of periodic alimony to the defendant. The court’s finding of operative facts and its conclusions follow.
The parties were married in 1970 and have one child, Julie, born March 30,1973. The defendant is forty years old and has suffered from multiple sclerosis since 1975. She is deteriorating physically and mentally to the extent that she is unable to care for herself and will in the future be unable to care for herself or engage in any occupation. Her parents have come from their Florida…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Jucker v. JuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Jackson v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. ArlineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Sokolowski v. Medi Mart, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Glinski v. GlinskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992