Legal Opinion

Abdullah Gunaydin and Husnu Kircali v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 4, 1984No. 83-3510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

In this deportation case, petitioners contend that a lawful entry into the United States nullified an earlier illegal entry without inspection. Their theory is that because their current presence in this country is based on a proper entry, the purposes of inspection have been accomplished and deportation for absence of inspection on an earlier border crossing is excessively harsh. We conclude that the Immigration and Naturality Act would be thwarted by such an interpretation and accordingly will deny the petition for review.

An Immigration Judge found…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Reid v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Russell Bufalino v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miguel Angel Leal-Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Etuk v. SlatteryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. ROMANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  4. Etuk v. SlatteryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Alaka v. ElwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API