Legal Opinion
ROMAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1988No. ID 3095PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3095 MATTER OF ROMAN In Deportation Proceedings A-37481891 Decided by Board December 16; 1988 A respondent in deportation proceedings who was excludable under both sections 212(aX17) and (20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
8 U.S.C. §§ 1182
(aX17) and (20) (1982), cannot establish combined eligibility for none pro tune permission to reapply for admission and a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to section 241(0 of the Act,
8 U.S.C. § 1251
(0 (1982), where she is not separately eligible for either form of relief. CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Sec. 241(aX1) [
8 U.S.C. § 1251
(aX…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- LOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
- Tim Lok v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Ignacio Osvaldo Hernandez-Almanza v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Robert M. Wall v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- G-DBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- Lara v. TrominskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Gregorio Perez-Gonzalez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jagubhai Naranbhai Patel, Vanitaben Thakorbhai Patel v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- GABRYELSKYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.