Woods v. Hyde
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. J. A. Allen, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff and appellant in this action is the owner and holder of a certain street improvement bond number 5, series number 2 of the city of Visalia, of the par value of $117.76, bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, issued by the city of Visalia, on the twelfth day of April, 1911, covering street improvement work in the city of Visalia under the provisions of an act providing a system of street improvement and issuance of bonds therefor, approved February 27, 1893. The bond in question was given to cover the expenses for street improvement chargeable to lot number 5…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Vickrey v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Valvo v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Los Angeles v. GlassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Lemhi County Ex Rel. Gilbreath v. Boise Livestock Loan Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Harless v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.