Legal Opinion

Moore v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1931No. 20759PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We think the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition. Under the specific facts, it should not be held as a matter of law that the petition failed to show negligence on the part of the defendant, or that the plaintiff was guilty of such negligence or *662want of care as to bar a recovery. This is not such a plain case that the court may decide it upon the pleadings and without reference to a jury; and the more especially is this true as regards the conduct of the plaintiff, since it is the rule in this State that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wynne v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Goddard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Hendricks v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Lebby v. Atlanta Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Avary v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Pilgreen v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Wardlaw v. Executive Committee of the Baptist ConventionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Boggs v. Griffeth Bros. Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Goldsmith v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API